A large accounting office floor with rows of desks

A standard NDA does not protect you from a competitor

A standard mutual NDA protects documents. It does not protect what a competitor actually wants: your customer names, contract-level pricing, employee pay, and the fact that you are for sale. Fix the definition, the term, the non-solicit, and the residuals clause. Then control what leaves the data room, and when.

Why does a standard NDA fail when the buyer is a competitor?

A standard NDA is built to stop publication, not to stop use. It restricts disclosure of marked documents, runs two or three years, and says nothing about hiring your people or calling your accounts. A competitor never has to publish a word of it to take value out of your business.

The rule is simple. A confidentiality agreement binds only what it defines, for as long as it runs. What sits outside the definition, or survives the term, is left to trade secret law, which protects only what you can prove you kept secret.

So a competitor signs the form NDA, takes a customer list with volumes and margins, walks away, and competes with information it did not have in January. Nothing was published, and where the agreement restricts only disclosure, there may be nothing to sue on.

I read the definition of confidential information and the use clause before anything else in an NDA, because those two paragraphs decide whether the remaining pages mean anything.

What should the definition of confidential information cover in a sale process?

The definition of confidential information should cover the existence of the process itself — that a sale is being explored, who is looking, what stage discussions have reached — plus all information furnished in any form, whether or not it is marked, and any notes, models, and analyses the buyer’s team derives from it.

Three failures are common in form NDAs:

  • Marked-only definitions. If the NDA protects “written materials marked Confidential,” an oral walkthrough of your customer concentration sits outside it.
  • No derivative coverage. The buyer’s analyst rebuilds your pricing grid in a spreadsheet of his own. Without derivative coverage, that file is his.
  • No process confidentiality. A competitor who cannot use your data can still call your largest accounts and mention that you are selling.

Cover the process, and back it with a no-contact clause. Mark the documents anyway: marking does not create the obligation, but it builds the record.

Law: 18 U.S.C. 1839(3).

How long should the NDA last, and what happens to trade secrets?

The NDA’s term needs to outlast the buyer’s interest in your market. Three to five years for general confidential information is workable in a private sale. Trade secrets need separate treatment inside the same agreement: they should stay protected for as long as they remain secret, rather than falling out when the general term lapses.

That split follows the statute, not a negotiating preference. Federal law treats information as a trade secret only while it is not generally known or readily ascertainable, derives economic value from that secrecy, and is the subject of reasonable measures to keep it secret. A two-year term on your formulas hands a competitor a date on which protection dissolves.

Write it as one sentence. Confidentiality and non-use obligations continue for five years, except that obligations as to trade secrets continue for so long as the information remains a trade secret under applicable law.

Law: 18 U.S.C. 1839(3).

What should the non-solicitation and no-contact provisions say?

Non-solicitation in a sale-process NDA should reach three groups: employees, customers, and suppliers. No-contact should bar the buyer from approaching any of them, and your lenders, about the transaction or anything else without written consent, with all traffic routed through one named contact. Two carve-outs are standard, and you should concede both.

  • General advertising. A job posting not targeted at your workforce is not solicitation. Refusing it makes the clause look punitive.
  • Unsolicited approaches. An employee who contacts the buyer on her own initiative sits outside the covenant. Keep “unsolicited” in. Keep “may be hired without further restriction” out.

Scope matters more than duration. Limit the covenant to employees, customers, and suppliers the buyer learned of through the process, for twelve to twenty-four months. A flat no-hire over your whole workforce invites a court to treat the clause as a restraint on the employees themselves, which is how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court came out on a business-to-business no-hire provision in 2021. That ruling binds Pennsylvania only, but the reasoning travels: the clause restrains people who never signed it.

Where the clause has to work matters too. California voids employee non-solicitation covenants and treats most customer non-solicits the same way, and other states cut them down by statute or judicial narrowing. Check the law of the state where your employees and accounts sit.

Case: Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLC, 249 A.3d 918 (Pa. 2021). Law: California Business and Professions Code 16600.

What is a residuals clause, and should you agree to one?

A residuals clause says information retained in the unaided memory of the buyer’s personnel may be used for any purpose, notwithstanding the rest of the NDA. Against a competitor, that clause dismantles the non-use covenant, because the pricing structure and account intelligence that matter most are what an experienced operator remembers. Strike it.

The clause also gives away protection the statute provides. The federal definition of a trade secret reaches information “whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized.” Memory is not a statutory exception.

A residuals clause is the buyer asking you to agree that memory is a loophole. It is not, until you sign the page that says it is.

If the buyer insists, the narrow trade is residual use of general skill and know-how only, excluding anything about your customers, pricing, costs, suppliers, pay, and technical specifications.

Law: 18 U.S.C. 1839(3).

Who can the buyer show your information to?

Permitted disclosure should run to representatives with a genuine need to know — lenders, accountants, counsel, insurance and diligence advisers — each informed of the NDA and bound to terms at least as protective, with the buyer liable for their breaches. You should be entitled, on request, to a list of who received what.

A buyer borrowing to fund the purchase will have to show your financials to a lender, so name lenders as permitted recipients. Do not accept “and its affiliates” without limitation, which for a competitor can mean a sister operating company in your territory.

Return-or-destroy belongs in the same section. Require return or destruction on termination of discussions, certification signed by an officer, and an end to all use. Then grant the carve-out that makes the certificate honest: copies in automated backup systems, and copies under legal hold, may remain, subject to the confidentiality obligations while kept.

Does the Defend Trade Secrets Act protect you if you hand files to a competitor?

The Defend Trade Secrets Act protects information as a trade secret only where the owner has taken reasonable measures to keep it secret. Sending pricing files and customer lists to a competitor with no signed agreement, no marking, and no access limits is evidence that no reasonable measures were taken. The statute then stops working.

The consequence is concrete. The Act gives the owner of a misappropriated trade secret a federal civil action where the secret relates to a product or service used in interstate commerce. A court may grant an injunction, award damages, add exemplary damages of up to twice the damages awarded for willful and malicious misappropriation, and award fees. Each remedy is discretionary, and none is reachable if you lose the reasonable measures element. In 2025 the Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a claimant that had not identified its secrets with particularity and had shared information without markings, password protection, or signed agreements.

Practical measures:

  • A signed NDA before anything beyond the teaser and a summary profit and loss.
  • Confidentiality legends on every file that leaves your control, and a data room with per-user permissions, download controls, and a printable log.
  • Current confidentiality agreements with the employees who staff the process, including the whistleblower immunity notice the Act requires in any such agreement entered into or updated after May 11, 2016. Without it, exemplary damages and fees are unavailable against that employee.

Law: 18 U.S.C. 1839(3)(A); 18 U.S.C. 1836(b); 18 U.S.C. 1836(b)(3); 18 U.S.C. 1833(b)(3).

Case: Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper, 134 F.4th 1078 (10th Cir. 2025).

How should you stage the data room when the buyer is a competitor?

Staging, not drafting, is where sellers lose control. The trap is sending the full customer list, contract-level pricing, and employee compensation detail with the first NDA, before the buyer has put a number on paper or shown it can fund the purchase. Tier the release, and tie each tier to something the buyer gives first.

StageWhat the buyer has given youWhat you releaseCompetitor handling
Signed NDASignature onlyBlind profile, three years of financials or returns, adjusted earnings, revenue mixNo customer names, no per-account pricing, no employee names
Indication of interestWritten value range, structure, source of funds, timingRevenue by customer as A, B, C, contract expiry dates, margin by product line, pay by departmentCoded identifiers; redact logos, locations, contract names
Letter of intent with exclusivityExclusivity, deposit where applicable, lender term sheet or proof of equityKey contracts with names, supplier terms, pipeline, technical documentationOutside adviser reviews pricing and customer files, reports aggregates
ConfirmatorySigned purchase agreement, or a funded closing date where sign and close coincideUnredacted customer and employee detail, source code, formulasRelease on a schedule, log preserved

Formal clean teams, with walled-off personnel and their own protocol, are a large-deal habit and you will rarely see one in a sale of this kind. The workable version is one named outside adviser, your accountant or counsel, who sees the unredacted files and reports aggregates until the deal is committed.

That handling is not only about leverage. Agreements among competitors that restrain trade are reachable under Section 1 of the Sherman Act at any deal size. In one 2002 matter, a large public deal, a buyer that controlled a target’s pricing and contracts before closing took injunctive relief on the Sherman Act claim plus a $638,000 penalty on the notification claims. Notification itself will usually not reach you: as of September 2026 the size-of-transaction threshold is $133.9 million for deals closing on or after February 17, 2026, readjusted annually. Section 1 has no threshold.

Law: 15 U.S.C. 1; 15 U.S.C. 18a.

Should your NDA include a standstill?

Standstill provisions restrict a buyer from acquiring shares, launching a tender offer, or approaching shareholders outside the negotiated process. They are a public-company tool and rarely belong in a private sale of this kind, where there is no public float to accumulate. Spend the negotiation on use, non-solicitation, and residuals instead.

Delaware is worth knowing on one point. A use restriction is a real covenant, and a court can enforce it by injunction where the equities support one: in 2012 the Court of Chancery found a bidder had breached two confidentiality agreements by moving information from friendly talks into a hostile bid, and enjoined it for four months, affirmed on appeal. That was public-company litigation, but the lesson transfers. “Solely for the purpose of evaluating a possible negotiated transaction” are enforceable words, so put them in.

Two clauses protect you as seller. A no-obligation clause: no deal exists until a definitive written agreement is signed. A non-reliance clause: you make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of diligence information, and representations arise only in the signed purchase agreement. Delaware’s Supreme Court enforced that pairing in 2012 to dismiss a bidder’s suit for its diligence costs. The protection came from the drafted words, so they have to be in your NDA.

Cases: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co., 68 A.3d 1208 (Del. 2012), affirming (Del. Ch. 2012); RAA Management, LLC v. Savage Sports Holdings, Inc., 45 A.3d 107 (Del. 2012).

What should you do before the next buyer signs an NDA?

The work is sequential, and most of it happens before a competitor is near your files. Start with the document you are already circulating. Then build the release schedule it is supposed to police, because a tightened NDA paired with an untiered data room still leaves your pricing in a rival’s hands.

  • Pull the NDA you are circulating. Check the definition, the term, the trade secret carve-out, the non-solicit, and whether a residuals clause sits in the use section.
  • Write the tier list before the first call. Customer names with volumes, contract-level pricing, employee pay, supplier rebates, source code, and CRM exports go last.
  • Ask your broker for a competitor-specific version. One form for financial buyers, a tightened one for competitors in your market.
  • Require a written indication of value and proof of funding before tier two. A buyer who will not put a range and a funding source on paper is paying for your list with nothing.

Do those four things and the NDA stops being a formality. It becomes the document that decides what a competitor walks away with.

Thinking about selling?

Have a lawyer read it before you sign.

A sale is decided in a handful of documents you sign exactly once — the letter of intent, the working capital definition, the indemnity. There is no rush. When you want those read properly, we are here.

Book a consultationHow we work with sellers

Joe Prencipe, Managing Partner of Prencipe International
Written by
Joe Prencipe
Managing Partner, Prencipe International

Before founding Prencipe International, Joe practiced at the top law firms in the world, including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Baker McKenzie, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, and served at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He has spent his career on high-stakes disputes and transactions for businesses that cannot afford to lose. He represents owners selling the company they spent a career building -- reading the letter of intent before it is signed, and the purchase agreement while there is still room to change it.

LinkedIn →

Share this:

You might also like

©2026 Prencipe International

PRENCIPEInternational
Sell-Side M&A · Counsel for Owners
★★★★★ 5.0 · 24 Google reviews
Book a consultation
PRENCIPEInternationalBook a consultation
©2026 Prencipe International
Sell-Side M&A · Nationwide